03 · Structure
The MSO structure separates the practice of law from the business of running a law firm. Attorneys own and control the practice. Consortium owns and operates the platform. Neither owns the other.
The MSO doctrine
The management services organization model has served medicine, dentistry, and veterinary care for decades. Consortium Law adapts it for the legal profession — with the rules of professional conduct as the design constraint, not the workaround.
Every affiliated law firm is a separate legal entity, wholly owned by one or more attorneys licensed in the firm's jurisdiction. Consortium Law MSO has no ownership interest in any affiliated law firm and no right to direct the practice of law.
Management services are compensated on a fixed, objectively calculated basis — per seat, per matter volume tier, or per infrastructure unit consumed. Consortium is not paid a percentage of legal fees, a contingent-fee split, or a case-outcome bonus.
Every legal decision — case acceptance, strategy, settlement authority, ethical screening — is made by the attorney of record at the affiliated firm. Consortium provides infrastructure, not legal judgment. The line is documented in the coalition agreement.
Every client engagement letter names the affiliated law firm as counsel of record. Legal fees are earned by and paid to the law firm. Trust accounting is maintained by the law firm. Consortium does not touch client funds.
The coalition agreement is reviewed annually by outside ethics counsel. A firm-owned attorney sits on the coalition operating committee. Any conflict between Consortium's business objectives and a firm's professional-responsibility obligations is resolved in favor of the profession.
Why the structure matters
A managing partner asks two questions before joining a platform: Is this legal? And is this going to constrain how I practice law?
The MSO structure answers both. Legal, because it is engineered to the rules of professional conduct as a design constraint. Non-constraining, because Consortium is contractually excluded from the practice of law and has no incentive to interfere with it.
The separation is not a legal formality — it is the operating premise that makes an institution-grade platform possible without compromising the profession.
The Consortium Law coalition agreement is shared under NDA with prospective member firms and their outside counsel. The document is not marketing collateral — it is the structural instrument that governs the relationship.